The Misguided Stance of the Copyright Office on AI-Generated Works
The use of AI image generating tools, like Midjourney, in the creative process has sparked concern. The U.S. Copyright Office has taken the position that the tool (not the user using the tool) is the author. The best example we have is the case of Kristina Kashtanova’s graphic novel, Zarya of the Dawn, which was partially generated using AI. The U.S. The Copyright Office initially granted her copyright protection but later revoked copyright protection for the AI-generated images in the work for lacking human authorship.
This reasoning is flawed. Since authorship is a core focus of copyright law, the issue of who the author is when using AI tools needs careful examination.
Let’s Talk About Hunter Biden’s Wiener And Why the Biden’s Need an IP Lawyer
The images on Hunter Biden's laptop are protected under copyright law, and public display of these images constitute copyright infringement.
It’s as easy for you to take and share images as it is for others to copy and display your images in places where you don’t want them. Understanding your intellectual property rights in images that you take and respecting other intellectual property rights in their own images is crucial, underscoring the importance of good IP counsel.
Intellectual Property Rights in the Age of AI
In this article, we will examine the challenges technologists and creators that use AI-based tools face obtaining ownership of their creations and how existing law addresses these issues.